I see by looking at the main 23 Things Cambridge site that my previous post missed out one aspect of the Thing, where we were asked to write Ďsomething about what you hope to get out of Cam 23 and your previous experience of Web 2.0 and social mediaí. At one level thatís simple to explain Ė Iím looking for a structured way to prod myself into trying some new technologies, and expand my technological horizons. Iíve used almost none of the 23 things actively before: in fact, blogging is the only thing I do regularly. Iíve looked occasionally at tweets, Flickr, Wordle, Flickr, wikis etc, but thatís it.
I canít really blame this either on my age (I may not have a Facebook account, but my father does) or on the fact that Iím a historian. And Iíve not always been a Luddite. 15 years ago or so, I was ahead of the game on Web 1.0. I was an early user of the latest search technology AltaVista and was even designing my own web pages for the library. So what happened to leave me behind the technological curve?
Partly, it was a lack of time. From 1999 I had a job and a PhD to deal with, then a PhD and a baby, then a toddler and an attempt at an academic career, then a school child and a book to write. None of this has really allowed me to have a social life, let alone an online one. Nor have I had the time to play around with interesting technologies, especially since so many of them seem to have a deceptive learning curve: itís possible to do something with them very quickly, but to use them effectively takes quite a lot of practice. (Maybe as a follow-up, each of us on the course should choose just one Thing and see what we can do with it over 12 weeks).
But I think itís also a deeper conceptual problem I have with social media, especially something like Facebook. One of the reasons I started this blog (and named it ĎMagistra and Materí) was to express the strangeness of living in two largely separate social and mental worlds, the domestic and the academic. My friends and acquaintances can generally be split into two separate groups: those who find it unremarkable (if pleasing) that CUP are going to publish a book of mine on early medieval history, and those who were having to rearrange their schedules frantically last week because it was half-term. With one group I discuss feudalism, with the other the easiest musical instrument for a seven year-old to learn. What can I say on a Facebook site that would interest both sets of people?
On the blog my usual compromise is to talk about motherhood in a vaguely academic voice. (An experienced academic can talk about anything in an academic tone of voice. You just have to include in your conversation the questions: ĎWhat are the wider implications of my experience?í and ĎWould the same thing have happened 100 years ago?í Or stick in the media parallels). The blog balancing act gets even more complicated, however, now that Iím adding in (at least temporarily) some librarianship. How do I say things of interest to both sides of the librarian/user divide? Will readers be willing to scroll past posts on the Staffordshire hoard to get to discussions of Delicious (or vice versa)? Social media is about making connections to others who are like you; unfortunately, I increasingly feel that my spheres of work leave me alone in the centre of a Venn diagram. (Did I mention Iím also an ex-mathematician?)